Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Gray and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto Z4 is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 79.8 score against 75.8. Motorola Moto Z4 is a extremely lighter and noticeably thinner cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Moto Z4 has the older 10 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S has a slightly better display than Motorola Moto Z4, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the nubia Red Magic 3S also counts with a quite bigger screen. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better performance than Motorola Moto Z4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola Moto Z4 counts with just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a superior battery performance than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has a 39% more battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Moto Z4, and although they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same diafragm aperture and the same back camera sensor size, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video definition.
The Moto Z4 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.