Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a general score of 84.7, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 overall score. The Galaxy A32 body is newer, a little lighter and a bit thinner than the nubia Red Magic 3S. Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and nubia Red Magic 3S comes with Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a better pixels density and a quite bigger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A32, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 3S and the Galaxy A32 both feature quite similar battery performance. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a lot higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.