Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-06-20 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A60 has an overall score of 82.3, which is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A60 has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Samsung Galaxy A60 is a somewhat thinner and noticeably lighter device than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were only released with a couple of months difference.
Galaxy A60 features a screen that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, because although the Galaxy A60 has a little smaller screen, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy A60, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a much better video resolution, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor which offers a lot higher image and video quality.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a very superior storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A60, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a way better battery performance than Galaxy A60, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.