Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is way better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie. Galaxy A71 5G's design is thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though they were released with only 8 months difference.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy A71 5G features a display that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G has a little greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, they both have a display of the same size.
Galaxy A71 5G takes a little bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution, a larger sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and higher 30 fps video frame rates.
The Galaxy A71 5G has a bigger memory capacity for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A71 5G, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Galaxy A71 5G is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.