Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-05-29 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Angel gold, Ghost white and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A80 has a score of 84.9, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Galaxy A80's design is just a bit thinner but just a bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, and they were only released 5 months apart. Nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A80, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit better screen than Galaxy A80, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a quite inferior pixels count per display inch, they both have a screen with the same size. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A80, and although they both have a same resolution camera and a same size camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way higher video definition and a bigger aperture.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A80, because it has more internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A80, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.