Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-10-16 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and White |
| Aluminum | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 90.5 score against 75.8. The Galaxy A90 5G design is thinner and a little lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, although both were released only 1 months apart. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android OS, and nubia Red Magic 3S works with Android 9.0 Pie OS.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Galaxy A90 5G features a display that is very similar to the nubia Red Magic 3S one, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a just a bit more pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a display of the same size.
Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera and a same size back camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better images in low light situations and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Galaxy A90 5G features a bit bigger memory for applications and games than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has an 11% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.