Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-10-16 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is an much older cellphone than the nubia Red Magic 3S, but it is notably thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has the older 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little larger screen, a just a little greater pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 3S has a greater camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture, a much better video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has improved battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.