Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-03-05 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31 has a score of 86.5, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's score of 75.8. Galaxy M31's body is just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though they were released with only 5 months difference. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M31 has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy M31, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM. The Galaxy M31 features a bit sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy M31 also counts with a little bit greater quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy M31 takes a bit better videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy M31 also counts with better video frame rate, a way more mega pixels camera in the back and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a quite bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy M31, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy M31 features superior battery lifetime than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 20 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.