Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2020-08-06 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is better than nubia Red Magic 3S's global score of 75.8. Samsung Galaxy M31s's body is newer, just a little thinner and just a little bit lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy M31s has an older 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy M31s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has more RAM memory. Galaxy M31s features a screen that is just as good as nubia Red Magic 3S's screen, because although the Galaxy M31s has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit greater pixel density.
The Galaxy M31s counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 512 GB. Galaxy M31s features superior battery performance than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy M31s counts with a slightly better camera than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos and videos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy M31s also counts with higher video frame rate, a much higher resolution camera in the back and a bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.