Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a global score of 79.3, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is an older device than nubia Red Magic 3S, but Samsung could make it way lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has 5.1 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a better CPU than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a bigger aperture, a much better 7680x4320 video definition, a much higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera in the back and a lot bigger sensor. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 67% greater battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.