Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 600.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.88 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 score. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is a lot newer and extremely thinner, but a bit heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones we compare here have Android OS, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has older 14 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a just a bit higher pixels amount in each display inch, a lot higher 2200 x 2480 resolution and a larger display. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a very superior performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes clearer videos and photos than nubia Red Magic 3S, and although they both have a F1.7 camera aperture and the same 7680x4320 video quality, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a lot bigger back camera sensor which gives a way higher image and video quality, faster video frame rates and a more MP camera in the back.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit longer battery life than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity instead of 5000mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Red Magic 3S. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get nubia Red Magic 3S, giving up a couple features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.