Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.8 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-16 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.58 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cyber shade | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, getting a 78.8 score against 75.8. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has an older 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. The vivo X60 Pro is a newer phone, and it's also noticeably thinner and somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 3S.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better looking screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2376 resolution. Vivo X60 Pro has a bit better performance than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both have 12 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a little bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a bigger aperture for better photography in low light situations and a way better 7680x4320 video quality.
The vivo X60 Pro and nubia Red Magic 3S count with incredibly similar storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, both of them have equal 256 GB internal memory. Nubia Red Magic 3S has superior battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.