Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, with a overall score of 81.6 against 75.7. Despite of the fact that the Google Pixel 2 is extremely older than nubia Red Magic 5G, it's construction is thinner and a lot lighter. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a bit worse pixels number per inch in the display, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a really larger screen. Nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a much larger camera sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Google Pixel 2 features as much memory to install games and applications as the nubia Red Magic 5G one, both of them have exactly the same internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 5G counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Google Pixel 2 is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.