Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL has an overall score of 81.3, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 global score. Google Pixel XL's design is thinner and much lighter than nubia Red Magic 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Pixel XL counts with a bit sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5G features just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM. The Google Pixel XL and nubia Red Magic 5G count with really similar storage to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5G has a very superior camera than Google Pixel XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a bigger camera aperture to take better images in poorly lited situations, a much more mega pixels back camera, faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Nubia Red Magic 5G features superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 30 percent bigger battery capacity.
Google Pixel XL is a lot more expensive than the nubia Red Magic 5G, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.