Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5G, having a 77.8 score against 75.7. These phones come with Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5G has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a little bit heavier than the nubia Red Magic 5G, it's way thinner and also a lot newer.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with an incredibly better looking display than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels, a just a bit better display density, much more display brightness and a larger screen. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The nubia Red Magic 5G has an extremely better processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 8 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has just a bit better camera than nubia Red Magic 5G, because although it has a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery performance than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as nubia Red Magic 5G. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 5G, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.