Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.7 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-04-21 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Hot Rod red and Eclipse black | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a score of 85.5, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5G's 75.7 general score. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is somewhat lighter and a little thinner than nubia Red Magic 5G, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more further than a year before. Xiaomi Pocophone F1's processing unit is just as good as the processor in nubia Red Magic 5G, they have 8 cores and the same RAM memory amount.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and nubia Red Magic 5G both count with quite similar screens, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little bit lower 1080 x 2246 resolution, a little smaller screen and less brightness, it also counts with a quite greater quantity of pixels per inch of display. The nubia Red Magic 5G shoots much better photographs and videos than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the nubia Red Magic 5G also has a bigger aperture, a back facing camera with a way better resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5G, because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 256 GB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.