Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having an 80.3 score against 76.2. Google Nexus 6P's body is lighter and incredibly thinner than the nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released 5 years before. Google Nexus 6P counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit superior processor than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM. Google Nexus 6P's memory capacity for apps and games is just as good as nubia Red Magic 5S's one, both of them have equal internal storage.
Nubia Red Magic 5S takes way better pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a bigger diafragm aperture, a much higher 7680x4320 video definition and a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a much better image quality. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with greater battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 30 percent greater battery size.
Google Nexus 6P costs a bit more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.