Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having a general score of 83.7 against 76.2. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is thinner and lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, despite of the fact that it was released around 16 months before. These phones have the same Android 10 OS, so you shouldn't notice any difference regarding OS features.
LG V50 ThinQ features a processing unit that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots much clearer photographs and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor and a much higher 7680x4320 video definition. LG V50 ThinQ features much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little longer battery performance than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 13 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the LG V50 ThinQ is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.