Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo is just a bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, having a global score of 76.4 against 76.2. These phones have Android operating system, but the Motorola Droid Turbo has the newer 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version. Motorola Droid Turbo's body is somewhat lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S, although it is thicker and was released 6 years before.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixel number in each inch of screen. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S has a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 5S captures greater pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a back-facing camera with much more megapixels, a way higher video definition and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and videos.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 15 percent bigger battery capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.