Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a overall score of 77.9 against 76.2. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. Despite of the fact Motorola DROID Turbo is noticeably older and thicker than the nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is still somewhat lighter.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a little better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and 4 more cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a sharper display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display pixels density.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with much more storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 15% larger battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a very superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a back camera with way more MP, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a bigger aperture.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the Motorola DROID Turbo is also a lot cheaper, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.