Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S, with an 81.2 score against 76.2. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is extremely newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has newer 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it gives you lots of additional features.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a little bit more pixels per screen inch, a bit higher resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and much more brightness. Motorola Edge 50 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has more internal memory.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior processing power than Motorola Edge 50. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a bit better battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a tinier sensor giving a worse image quality, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a back camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.