Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Mystic indigo |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus has a general score of 79.7, which is just a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. These phones include Android OS, but Moto G Stylus has a newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features and increased performance. Moto G Stylus's body is a bit thinner and lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit faster processor than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a higher amount of RAM. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more vivid display than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little bit lower screen density, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a bit larger screen.
Moto G Stylus has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Moto G Stylus also has an external memory card slot that holds up to 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit better camera than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back camera with way more megapixels, a way higher video resolution and a larger back-facing camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better battery performance than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 13 percent more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Moto G Stylus is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.