Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
OPPO Find X3 Pro is slightly better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a 79.9 score against 76.2. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the OPPO Find X3 Pro has 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it provides a couple additional features. Even when the OPPO Find X3 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a couple of months difference, the OPPO Find X3 Pro is thinner and lighter.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro features a little faster processor than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a little more vivid display than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher 1440 x 3216 resolution and a greater number of pixels per inch of screen.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better camera than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has a smaller sensor capturing worse quality videos and photographs, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a much greater storage to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a battery duration that's just as good as nubia Red Magic 5S's battery duration.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.