Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 385 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting an 84.7 score against 76.2. Even when Galaxy A32 and nubia Red Magic 5S were released only a couple of months apart, Galaxy A32 is just a little lighter and just a little thinner. Galaxy A32 comes with Android OS, while nubia Red Magic 5S comes with Android 10 OS.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little bigger display and a greater screen density. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a bit longer battery duration than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has an 11% greater battery capacity.
Nubia Red Magic 5S shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.