Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has a general score of 91.8, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though both were only released 3 months apart. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 5G has the newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, giving you lots of additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little worse screen pixels density, they both have a screen with the same size. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same sensor size and a back camera with a 64 mega pixels, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher video resolution. Galaxy A71 5G has a way bigger storage for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A71 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features a battery life that's very similar to the nubia Red Magic 5S one.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.