Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android |
| 2020-09-02 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. Although the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is older than nubia Red Magic 5S, it's construction is somewhat thinner and a little lighter. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, while nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 operating system.
The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch and a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, they both have a screen of the same size. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a very superior storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has an external memory slot that admits up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A90 5G features a CPU that's just as good as the processing unit in nubia Red Magic 5S, and although the Galaxy A90 5G has a lower amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Nubia Red Magic 5S and Samsung Galaxy A90 5G both count with very similar battery durations. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a much higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera and a larger aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.