Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-09-02 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and Gold |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S's global score of 76.2. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro design is extremely thinner and somewhat lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released 4 years before. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10, providing the user lots of additional features.
Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy C9 Pro has slightly more memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 256 GB.
The nubia Red Magic 5S has a bit more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has more RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S shoots greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light photography and videos, a way higher video resolution and a way more megapixels camera.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.