Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 579.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than nubia Red Magic 5S, having a 77.8 score against 76.2. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a way newer phone, and it is also notably thinner and just a bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic 5S. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has newer 14 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10.
Nubia Red Magic 5S features a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much more vibrant display than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has a larger screen, a just a little better screen pixels density, a lot better 2200 x 2480 resolution and way more screen brightness.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way bigger memory to install applications and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 512 GB internal memory. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a little bit better photographs and videos than nubia Red Magic 5S, because although it has a much less MP camera in the back and a lower 7680x4320 video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better low-light photos and video and a much larger camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has improved battery life than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than the nubia Red Magic 5S, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the nubia Red Magic 5S. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the nubia Red Magic 5S, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.