Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-09-02 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 385 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.32 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than the nubia Red Magic 5S's overall score of 76.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS (operating system), but vivo X60 Pro has a newer 11 version and nubia Red Magic 5S has Android 10 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. Even though vivo X60 Pro and the nubia Red Magic 5S were only released with a couple months difference, vivo X60 Pro is lighter and much thinner.
The vivo X60 Pro features a bit better hardware performance than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The nubia Red Magic 5S features a little sharper screen than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit worse screen density and a quite lower 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit bigger display.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Red Magic 5S has just a little better battery duration than vivo X60 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The nubia Red Magic 5S has a little bit better camera than vivo X60 Pro, and although they both have a F1.8 camera aperture, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a way higher video resolution, a much more mega-pixels back camera and a larger back camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.