Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.2 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Xiaomi | |
| Android 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-02 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.76 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Sonic silver | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 579.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 385 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.32 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is much better than the nubia Red Magic 5S, getting a global score of 85.5 against 76.2. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is an way older phone than nubia Red Magic 5S, but Xiaomi managed to build it just a little thinner and lighter. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 and nubia Red Magic 5S both feature incredibly similar processors, both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a display that's just as good as nubia Red Magic 5S's screen, because although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels, less brightness and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. Nubia Red Magic 5S has a very superior camera than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a much higher video quality, a way bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality pictures and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and video in low-light situations.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a superior storage for apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit longer battery life than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because it has a 13 percent larger battery size.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.