Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | iOS 15.x |
| 2019-01-31 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.76 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) is much better than nubia Red Magic Mars, having a score of 86.6 against 69.7. Apple iPhone SE (2022)'s design is a lot newer, much thinner and extremely lighter than nubia Red Magic Mars. Apple iPhone SE (2022) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and nubia Red Magic Mars has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior processing power than nubia Red Magic Mars, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. The Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit more vivid display than nubia Red Magic Mars, although it has a just a little worse display density, a much smaller screen and a lot worse 750 x 1334px resolution.
The nubia Red Magic Mars counts with a little bit better camera than iPhone SE (2022), because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same camera aperture and the same video quality, the nubia Red Magic Mars also counts with a back camera with a much better 16 MP resolution.
The nubia Red Magic Mars has a superior memory to store more apps and games than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 128 GB internal storage. The nubia Red Magic Mars has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone SE (2022), because it has 3800mAh of battery capacity.
The Apple iPhone SE (2022) is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the nubia Red Magic Mars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.