Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-01-31 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.23 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.81 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 449.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.76 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola Droid Turbo is a little bit better than nubia Red Magic Mars, having a overall score of 76.4 against 69.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Droid Turbo has an older 4.4.4 version while nubia Red Magic Mars has Android 9.0 Pie version. Motorola Droid Turbo's construction is a little bit lighter than the nubia Red Magic Mars, although it's thicker and was released 4 years before.
Nubia Red Magic Mars has a bit better processor than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more processing cores and more RAM. Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than nubia Red Magic Mars, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a better display density.
The nubia Red Magic Mars counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better battery performance than nubia Red Magic Mars, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The nubia Red Magic Mars captures slightly better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lot lower 16 megapixels resolution camera and a worse video quality, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low-light images and video.
The Motorola Droid Turbo is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.