Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2015-11-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Nexus 6P is better than the nubia Z20, with a general score of 80.3 against 71.9. The Google Nexus 6P design is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter than nubia Z20, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Google Nexus 6P features a slightly better looking screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The nubia Z20 has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the nubia Z20 also has 5 GB more RAM memory. The nubia Z20 has a superior camera than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a bigger back camera sensor providing a better image quality, a camera in the back with lot more megapixels and a bigger aperture to take better captures and videos in poorly lited environments.
The Google Nexus 6P's storage capacity for apps and games is very similar to the nubia Z20 one, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The nubia Z20 features a little better battery performance than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 16 percent larger battery capacity.
Google Nexus 6P costs more than the nubia Z20, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.