Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is much better than nubia Z20, having a general score of 81.3 against 71.9. The Google Pixel XL construction is just a bit thinner and just a little bit lighter than the nubia Z20, although it was released 3 years before. Nubia Z20 counts with a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel XL, because it has a greater number of cores and more RAM.
Google Pixel XL has a slightly better display than nubia Z20, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Google Pixel XL has as much memory to store more apps and games as nubia Z20, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage.
The nubia Z20 features a bit better battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Nubia Z20 has a much better camera than Google Pixel XL, because it has a bigger aperture, a much better video quality, a back camera with much more MP and a larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
The Google Pixel XL costs a lot more than the nubia Z20, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.