Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-10-14 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | 16 777 216 |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V20 is a bit better than nubia Z20, with a 77 score against 71.9. Despite of the fact that the LG V20 is much older than the nubia Z20, it's construction is just a little bit lighter and thinner. The nubia Z20 has a bit better CPU than LG V20, because it has a higher amount of RAM and 4 more cores.
LG V20 has a little more vivid screen than nubia Z20, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Nubia Z20 captures much better photos and videos than LG V20, because it has a larger aperture to capture better captures and videos in low-light environments, a lot larger sensor which provides a way higher photo and video quality, a way better 7680x4320 video resolution and a much more mega pixels camera.
The LG V20 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than nubia Z20, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Nubia Z20 has improved battery performance than LG V20, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
LG V20 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.