Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| LG | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-10-14 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Aurora black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is better than the nubia Z20's 71.9 overall score. The LG V50 ThinQ is a a little lighter and a little bit thinner cellphone than the nubia Z20, even when both were released only a few months apart. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better screen than nubia Z20, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a higher pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The nubia Z20 counts with a little faster CPU than LG V50 ThinQ, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Z20 also has a higher amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better storage to store more games and applications than nubia Z20, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB. The nubia Z20 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and video in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 7680x4320 video definition, a way bigger back camera sensor taking lot higher quality videos and photos and a much more mega pixels back camera.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a battery performance that's just as good as the battery performance in nubia Z20.
The LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.