Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than nubia Z20's overall score of 71.9. Motorola Droid Turbo is a incredibly older and incredibly thicker device than nubia Z20, but Motorola managed to make it a little lighter anyway. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Motorola Droid Turbo has 4.4.4 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a better looking display than nubia Z20, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440 resolution. Nubia Z20 features a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
The nubia Z20 counts with just a little better processing power than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a higher number of cores and 5 GB more RAM. Nubia Z20 features a better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution back camera, a lot higher video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
Nubia Z20 features a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Motorola Droid Turbo is also by far the cheapest one, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.