Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black and Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo is a bit better than nubia Z20, having a 77.9 score against 71.9. Despite of the fact the Motorola DROID Turbo is way older and notably thicker than nubia Z20, it's design is still a little bit lighter. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has older 4.4.4 version and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Z20 counts with a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a larger number of faster cores. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a more vivid display than nubia Z20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Nubia Z20 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity. Nubia Z20 has a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. Nubia Z20 features a better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a lot higher video resolution, a bigger aperture and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Motorola DROID Turbo is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.