Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a score of 84.7, which is much better than nubia Z20's score of 71.9. Galaxy A32's construction is newer, but a bit heavier and just a little thicker than nubia Z20. The Galaxy A32 works with Android operating system, and nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie operating system.
The nubia Z20 has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the nubia Z20 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The nubia Z20 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than nubia Z20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Nubia Z20 captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the nubia Z20 also has a way better video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Galaxy A32 counts with superior battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.