Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Black and White |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 549.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.22 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a bit better than the nubia Z20, getting a global score of 77.8 against 71.9. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro body is extremely newer and extremely thinner than nubia Z20's, although it is somewhat heavier. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has 14 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better screen than nubia Z20, because it has a just a bit higher pixels count per inch in the display, a much brighter screen, a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480px and a larger screen. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much greater storage for games and applications than nubia Z20, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The nubia Z20 has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery duration than nubia Z20, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much better camera than nubia Z20, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture and the same 7680x4320 video definition, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a better resolution camera in the back, higher video frame rate and a way bigger camera sensor.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more than nubia Z20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as nubia Z20. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the nubia Z20, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.