Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Vivo | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-10-14 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.25 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Diamond black and Twilight blue | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 549.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 430 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.22 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X60 Pro has a general score of 78.8, which is a little bit better than nubia Z20's global score of 71.9. The vivo X60 Pro construction is newer, somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than nubia Z20. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the vivo X60 Pro has the older 11 version while nubia Z20 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The nubia Z20 has a little bit better display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2340px resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density. The vivo X60 Pro has a bit more powerful CPU than nubia Z20, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The vivo X60 Pro has a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than nubia Z20, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. Vivo X60 Pro captures just a bit better videos and photos than nubia Z20, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and video, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a 0.5 inches back-facing camera sensor and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with faster video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than nubia Z20, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.