Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | -- |
| 2015-04-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.09 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Oxford blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 400.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G is way better than the nubia Z9 Max, with a general score of 84.6 against 61.4. Although the Motorola One 5G is a lot newer than the nubia Z9 Max, it is noticeably heavier and thicker. Motorola One 5G counts with just a little better hardware performance than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola One 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola One 5G features a bit more vivid display than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a bigger screen, a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution and a bit more pixels per screen inch. Motorola One 5G shoots much clearer photographs and videos than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same 30 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola One 5G also has a larger aperture, a way larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a lot higher 48 mega pixels resolution back camera.
The Motorola One 5G features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Z9 Max, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G counts with a way better battery life than nubia Z9 Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G is also a bit cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.