Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 61.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 5.0 Lollipop | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-04-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.09 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 400.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is a lot better than nubia Z9 Max, getting a global score of 87.5 against 61.4. Both devices in this comparison work with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 has older 11 version and nubia Z9 Max has Android 5.0 Lollipop version. Even though the Galaxy A71 is a little heavier than nubia Z9 Max, it's just a bit thinner and also extremely newer.
Samsung Galaxy A71 has a screen that's just as good as the screen in nubia Z9 Max, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400. The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with a little better performance than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy A71 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Z9 Max, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A71 captures much better videos and photos than nubia Z9 Max, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has a larger aperture for better low-light captures, a back facing camera with lot more megapixels and a much larger camera sensor which provides a lot higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 features a much better battery life than nubia Z9 Max, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 costs a bit more than the nubia Z9 Max, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.