Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.9 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-11-01 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.20 x 2.94 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.53 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 208.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 630 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.68 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a general score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than OnePlus 6T's overall score of 72.9. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is somewhat heavier than the OnePlus 6T, it's noticeably thinner and extremely newer. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper display than OnePlus 6T, because it has a bit higher display pixel density, a way higher resolution of 2200 x 2480 and a bigger screen.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than OnePlus 6T, because it has more internal memory capacity. The OnePlus 6T has a very superior CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better photographs and videos than OnePlus 6T, and although they both have the same aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much bigger sensor taking much better quality pictures, a lot better video quality and a back facing camera with a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a really longer battery lifetime than OnePlus 6T, because it has a 54% more battery capacity.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than OnePlus 6T, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as OnePlus 6T. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the OnePlus 6T, letting go some specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.