Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| OnePlus | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-21 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.31 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Glacial green | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 330.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | -- |
| 405 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1100 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.88 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than OnePlus 8's overall score of 76. Even being the best cellphone we are comparing here, it must be told that it's also thicker and heavier. OnePlus 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a lot worse amount of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory capacity to store more games and applications than OnePlus 8, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. OnePlus 8 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OnePlus 8 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery performance than OnePlus 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 4300mAh. The OnePlus 8 captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting way better quality videos and photos, a much better video quality and a much more MP camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than OnePlus 8, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the OnePlus 8. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the OnePlus 8, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.