Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.2 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 4.4 | -- |
| -- | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.42 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| -- | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 is a lot better than OPPO 3000, with an 81.9 score against 56.2. Google Pixel 4 is a way heavier but just a little bit thinner cellphone than the OPPO 3000. Google Pixel 4 and OPPO 3000 both feature very similar displays, although the Google Pixel 4 also has a lot higher 1080 x 2280 resolution, a better pixels density and a larger display.
Google Pixel 4 counts with a much better storage capacity for apps and games than OPPO 3000, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Google Pixel 4 features a little better processing power than OPPO 3000, because although it has a 32 bits processor against 64-bits and doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with 4 more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
The Google Pixel 4 counts with a really longer battery duration than OPPO 3000, because it has a 2800mAh battery capacity. Google Pixel 4 has a very superior camera than OPPO 3000, because it has a much larger back-facing camera sensor capturing way better quality pictures and videos, a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light captures.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, Google Pixel 4 is also a bit cheaper, making it easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.