Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.2 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-08-20 |
| 5.42 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| -- | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a has a score of 82.9, which is way better than OPPO 3000's 56.2 score. Both devices in this comparison review have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has a newer 11 version and OPPO 3000 has Android 4.4 version. Google Pixel 4a's body is just a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than OPPO 3000.
The OPPO 3000 features a little sharper display than Google Pixel 4a, although it has a way lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels, a bit smaller screen and a lot lower display pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a has a much better memory capacity for games and applications than OPPO 3000, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a features a bit faster processor than OPPO 3000, because although it has a 32-bit processor instead of 64-bits and doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Google Pixel 4a features a really longer battery life than OPPO 3000, because it has a 57% greater battery capacity.
The Google Pixel 4a captures a lot better videos and photos than OPPO 3000, because it has a much bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos, a back camera with a way higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Google Pixel 4a is also cheaper than the OPPO 3000, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.