Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.2 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| -- | 2020-04-29 |
| 5.42 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| -- | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A51 5G is way better than the OPPO 3000, with a 90.8 score against 56.2. The Galaxy A51 5G is a noticeably heavier but a little thinner phone than OPPO 3000. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A51 5G has 11 version and OPPO 3000 has Android 4.4 version. OPPO 3000 has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A51 5G, although it has a little bit lower screen pixels density, a really smaller display and a lot lower resolution of 1280 x 720 pixels.
Galaxy A51 5G has just a bit better performance than OPPO 3000, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor and a 32-bit processing unit instead of 64-bits, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than OPPO 3000, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO 3000, because it has a 125 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a greater camera than OPPO 3000, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a way larger sensor.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G is also cheaper than the OPPO 3000.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.