Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 56.2 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | Samsung |
| Android 4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-16 |
| 5.42 x 2.71 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| -- | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 350.00 | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.62 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.31 inches (1/3.2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.59 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a lot better than OPPO 3000's 56.2 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G's design is thinner but noticeably heavier than the OPPO 3000. These devices have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S10 5G has a newer 11 version and OPPO 3000 has Android 4.4.
Galaxy S10 5G has a bit superior processor than OPPO 3000, because although it has a 32-bits processing unit against 64-bits and doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores. The Galaxy S10 5G has a little more vivid display than OPPO 3000, because it has a much bigger screen, a way greater display density and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a greater camera than OPPO 3000, because it has a lot larger camera sensor taking way better quality pictures, a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a lot bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light situations. Galaxy S10 5G features a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than OPPO 3000, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 248 GB more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S10 5G features a superior battery performance than OPPO 3000, because it has a 125% bigger battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.