Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Oppo | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-05-03 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.30 x 2.89 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.10 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmo Blue and Fluid Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 411 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 800U MT6853 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.44 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4310mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.16 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 is much better than the OPPO A94 5G, with a general score of 81.6 against 74.1. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same thickness than OPPO A94 5G, but it's somewhat lighter. OPPO A94 5G counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO A94 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OPPO A94 5G has a bit more vivid display than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel count in each inch of screen, it also counts with a larger display and a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Google Pixel 2's memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is very similar to OPPO A94 5G's one, both have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
The OPPO A94 5G has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 60% larger battery capacity. The OPPO A94 5G counts with a much better camera than Google Pixel 2, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the OPPO A94 5G also has a way bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photos, a much better 48 MP resolution camera and a larger diafragm aperture for better photos in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.